🔥 Top Bonus Get £200 Welcome Package + 11 Wager-Free Spins at MrVegas — Claim Now18+ • T&Cs apply • Play responsibly
HomeNewsTipsCasinosGame ProvidersSlotsGuidesAboutEditorial PolicyResponsible Gambling
Home / News / UKGC & Regulation / Three states killed sweepstakes casinos in May. Th…
UKGC & Regulation · 31 May 2026

Three states killed sweepstakes casinos in May. The model is collapsing fast

Tennessee signed its ban into law on May 22. Oklahoma overrode a governor veto. Louisiana joined the list. That is three states in one month treating dual-currency sweepstakes as unlicensed gambling. The dual-currency loophole is closing.

By Christian Nielsen

GeekyGambler — UKGC regulation news
GeekyGambler — UKGC regulation news

Three states moved against sweepstakes casinos in the same month. That is not a coincidence. That is a model running out of legal cover.

Tennessee Governor Bill Lee signed SB 2136 into law on 22 May, taking effect on the spot. The law bans online sweepstakes games that use virtual-currency, dual-currency or multi-currency systems where the play currency can be exchanged for cash or prizes. Tennessee is now the seventh state to prohibit the dual-currency model.

Oklahoma is the louder story. Legislators voted to override Governor Kevin Stitt’s veto of SB 1589. The ban takes effect 1 November 2026 and the criminal penalties are not gentle. Operators, suppliers, affiliates, payment processors, geolocation providers and promoters can all be held liable. Violations are classified as felonies with fines of $500 to $2,000 and possible jail time.

Louisiana enacted similar legislation in the same window. The Gambling Insider monthly tracker for May confirms a third state in the wave.

Why now

Sweepstakes casinos have always lived in a strange legal grey. The argument runs: you give players “free” Gold Coins for entertainment, and as a sweepstakes promotion they get Sweeps Coins which can be redeemed for cash. The model deliberately mirrored the structure used by Publishers Clearing House and McDonald’s Monopoly. Different product, same legal scaffolding.

State attorneys general stopped buying it. The Tennessee AG sent cease-and-desist letters to sweepstakes operators in late 2025 and several companies left the state before the bill even passed. That is a tell. Operators only voluntarily exit a market when their lawyers think the eventual fine will be larger than the lost revenue.

What changed is the legislative interpretation. Lawmakers stopped looking at the mechanics and started looking at the player experience. If the average user thinks they are gambling, regulators are now happy to say it counts as gambling.

The affiliate problem

Here is the bit most affiliate operators are quietly working through right now. Oklahoma’s SB 1589 explicitly names affiliates as parties that can face criminal penalties. That is unusual. Most state gambling laws target operators and let affiliates off with civil exposure at worst. SB 1589 reads as if it was drafted with affiliate marketing specifically in mind.

If you run a sweepstakes-focused site with traffic from Oklahoma, Tennessee or Louisiana, your legal position from 1 November is different from your position today. Geo-blocking by state is the obvious fix. Most major affiliates already do this for restricted markets. The smaller ones often do not.

I have been watching some of the larger sweepstakes-focused review sites quietly drop banned states from their landing pages over the past fortnight. No public announcement. Just code changes.

What is left

The list of states that still allow dual-currency sweepstakes is shrinking and the operator response so far has been to lean harder on the markets that remain. Stake.us, Chumba, Pulsz and the rest are pushing harder in Florida, Texas, Illinois and California. Those four states represent the bulk of remaining sweepstakes revenue.

California is the one to watch. There has been legislative interest there since early 2026 and the operator concentration is high. If California moves, the sweepstakes business model is effectively done in any market that matters.

My read

The sweepstakes model worked for five years because regulators were focused on real-money operators and treated sweepstakes as a quirky edge case. That window has closed. The pace of state-level bans has gone from one every six months in 2024 to three in a single month in 2026.

Operators who built their growth strategy on the assumption that sweepstakes would coexist with regulated igaming were wrong. The two cannot coexist at scale, because regulated operators correctly point out that sweepstakes capture the same customer demand without paying the same tax. State legislators eventually agreed with them.

If you are a player, the practical impact is straightforward. Check whether your sweepstakes account is still letting you redeem from your state. If you are an affiliate, the practical impact is bigger. The traffic you were sending to Stake.us or Chumba from a Tennessee landing page on 21 May is not the same traffic the morning after.

This wave is not over. Watch the next legislative sessions in Texas and California closely.

AI disclosure: This article was drafted with AI assistance from primary sources, then reviewed for factual accuracy before publication. See our editorial policy for full details.

18+ only. Gambling can be addictive — play responsibly. Visit

18+ Licensed Casinos Only Responsible Gambling Self-Exclusion Tools